A. STUCKI CO. v. BUCKEYE STEEL CASTINGS CO.

No. 91-1502.

963 F.2d 360 (1992)

A. STUCKI COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BUCKEYE STEEL CASTINGS COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

May 6, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Raymond G. Hasley, Rose, Schmidt, Hasley & DiSalle, Pittsburgh, Pa., argued, for plaintiff-appellant.

Charles C. Hileman, Schnader, Harrison, Segal & Lewis, Philadelphia, Pa., argued, for defendant-appellee.

Before RICH, Circuit Judge, COWEN, Senior Circuit Judge, and CLEVENGER, Circuit Judge.


RICH, Circuit Judge.

A. Stucki Company (Stucki) appeals from the June 19, 1991 judgment of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, Case No. C2-88-0308, granting summary judgment in favor of defendant Buckeye Steel Castings Company (Buckeye) and rejecting Stucki's claim that by virtue of Buckeye's part shareholder interest in and alleged control of now-defunct Railroad Dynamics, Inc. (RDI), Buckeye should now be held jointly and severally liable...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases