WINGARD v. EXXON CO., U.S.A.

Civ. A. No. 3:90-2714-21.

819 F.Supp. 497 (1992)

Thomas H. WINGARD, Doc Brown, Heber Branham, George Giles, R.L. Newman, Michael J. Broom, and T. Frank Cone, Plaintiffs, v. EXXON CO., U.S.A., Defendant.

United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Columbia Division.

October 28, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stephen Jahue Moore, West Columbia, SC, Dimitri G. "Jim" Daskal, Washington, DC, for plaintiffs.

James Covington Parham, Jr., Greenville, SC, Gaspare J. Bono and Gilbert S. Keteltas, Washington, DC, for defendant.


AMENDED ORDER

TRAXLER, District Judge.

This matter is before me on the motion of the defendant ("Exxon") for summary judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56.1 I grant the motion as to all causes of action.

I. SUMMARY JUDGMENT STANDARD

The standard for granting summary judgment is well known.

Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c) states, as to a party who has moved for summary judgment:

The judgment sought...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases