Leon NEUFELD, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
The CITY OF BALTIMORE; the Mayor and City Council of Baltimore, in their official capacities and their successors in title; the Board of Municipal and Zoning Appeals of Baltimore City; Robert E. Smith, as Director of the Office of Communication and Cable of the City of Baltimore, Defendants-Appellees.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued March 5, 1992.
Decided May 19, 1992.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
William Edward Seekford, Towson, Md., argued, for plaintiff-appellant.
Sandra Rosenbaum Gutman, Acting Principal Counsel, Baltimore, Md., argued (Michael G. Raimondi, Asst. City Sol., on the brief), for defendants-appellees.
Before SPROUSE, Circuit Judge, MICHAEL, United States District Judge for the Western District of Virginia, sitting by designation, and SIMONS, Senior United States District Judge for the District of South Carolina, sitting by designation.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
SPROUSE, Circuit Judge:
The question presented is whether the district court correctly abstained under the Burford doctrine1 in dismissing Leon Neufeld's suit involving constitutional and preemption issues relating to a Baltimore City zoning ordinance regulating size and placement of television antennas. We believe the district court improperly abstained under Burford and, accordingly, reverse and remand.
I
...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.