WILLIAMS v. KUPPENHEIMER MFG. CO., INC.

No. 9126SC236.

412 S.E.2d 897 (1992)

105 N.C. App. 198

Donald Carroll WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. KUPPENHEIMER MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC., a Corporation, d/b/a Kuppenheimer Men's Clothiers, Defendant.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

January 21, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lacy W. Blue, Charlotte, for plaintiff-appellee.

Parker, Poe, Adams & Bernstein by David N. Allen and Ronald L. Cornell, Jr., Charlotte, for defendant-appellant.


WALKER, Judge.

Defendant first asserts that its motion for a directed verdict should have been allowed since plaintiff failed as a matter of law to establish the necessary elements of malicious prosecution. Upon defendant's motion for directed verdict, the plaintiff's evidence must be considered in the light most favorable to plaintiff, thereby giving him the benefit of every reasonable inference to be drawn. A directed verdict is not proper unless it appears as a...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases