SKERENCAK v. FISCHMAN


182 A.D.2d 1127 (1992)

Gail Skerencak, Respondent, v. Edward H. Fischman, Individually and Doing Business as Podiatry Services, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Fourth Department.

April 24, 1992


Order affirmed without costs.

Memorandum:

Supreme Court properly granted plaintiff's motion. Plaintiff was entitled to serve a supplemental bill of particulars at least 30 days before trial (CPLR 3043 [b]); Rodriguez v Port Auth., 147 A.D.2d 625, 626; Portnow v Shelter Rock Pub. Lib., 125 A.D.2d 382). Moreover, the record establishes that defendant was aware of the additional...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases