1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 182 A.D.2d
  5. 182 A.D.2d 1124 (1992)
 

OURIEL v. OURIEL

182 A.D.2d 1124 (1992)

Robert Ouriel, as Attorney-In-Fact for Sophie Ouriel, Respondent, v. Jacob Ouriel, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Fourth Department.

April 24, 1992

Order and judgment unanimously affirmed with costs.

Memorandum:

Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in failing to grant defendant's motion for recusal. "The presence of bias or prejudice on the part of a sitting Judge is generally a matter of personal conscience (Casterella v Casterella, 65 A.D.2d 614, 615, app dsmd 46 N.Y.2d 939) and is, at best, a matter of discretionary disqualification" (Matter of Smith...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases