1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.2d
  4. 821 S.W.2d
  5. 821 S.W.2d 480 (1992)
 

GOMEZ v. SARGENT

No. 91-341.

821 S.W.2d 480 (1992)

308 Ark. 263

Carlos GOMEZ, Petitioner, v. Willis SARGENT, Warden, Cummins Unit, Arkansas Department of Correction, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Arkansas.

February 3, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Carlos Gomez, pro se.

Brad Newman, Asst. Atty. Gen., Little Rock, for respondent.

MOTION TO FILE HANDWRITTEN BRIEF

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Carlos Gomez has filed a pro se motion to file a handwritten brief alleging that he has no access to a typewriter. We have held that handwritten briefs, if legible, will be accepted provided the appellant makes a showing that there is substantial merit to his suit. Patterson v. Smith, 289 Ark. 564, 712 S.W.2d 922 (1986). No...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases