SPRADLIN v. ARKANSAS ETHICS COM'N

No. 92-371.

837 S.W.2d 463 (1992)

William E. SPRADLIN and Republican Party of Arkansas, Appellants, v. ARKANSAS ETHICS COMMISSION, Richard L. Mays, Mary Lynn Reese, Ronald A. May, Kemal Kutait and Mack R. Koonce, in Their Official Capacities as Members of the Arkansas Ethics Commission, Appellees.

Supreme Court of Arkansas.

September 28, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

W. Asa Hutchinson, Ft. Smith, Rob R. Brooks, Jr., No. Little Rock, for appellants.

Winston Bryant, Atty. Gen., Little Rock, for appellees.


RESPONSE TO MOTION TO DISQUALIFY

DUDLEY, Justice.

The six other members of this court have disqualified from participation in this appeal for separate and valid reasons of their own. The appellants have respectfully suggested that all members of this court might desire to disqualify. See Rule 27 of the Rules of the Supreme Court. I decline to do so on the basis suggested by appellants but, even so, have decided that I ought to disqualify for a different...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases