BICKFORD v. TEKTRONIX, INC.

A8910-05880; CA A65827.

842 P.2d 432 (1992)

116 Or. App. 547

Charles BICKFORD, Appellant, v. TEKTRONIX, INC., Jay Prasad and Jack Sachitano, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided November 25, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Glen H. Downs, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. On the briefs were David Paul, Charles J. Merten and Merten & Associates, Portland.

Eileen Drake, Portland, argued the cause for respondents. On the brief were Randolph C. Foster, Charles F. Adams, Kevin M. Keaney and Stoel Rives Boley Jones & Grey, Portland.

Before BUTTLER, P.J., and ROSSMAN and DE MUNIZ, JJ.


DE MUNIZ, Judge.

Plaintiff appeals from a summary judgment for defendants on his claims for intentional infliction of emotional distress and defamation. ORCP 47. We affirm.

We review the record in the light most favorable to plaintiff, the party opposing summary judgment. Stanfield v. Laccoarce, 288 Or. 659, 665, 607 P.2d 177 (1980). On October 11, 1989, plaintiff was fired. He had worked...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases