1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 802 F.Supp.
  5. 802 F.Supp. 469 (1992)
 

TECHSNABEXPORT, LTD. v. U.S.

Court No. 92-04-00248.

802 F.Supp. 469 (1992)

TECHSNABEXPORT, LTD., et al., Plaintiffs, v. The UNITED STATES, et al., Defendants, and AD HOC Committee of Domestic Uranium Producers, et al., Defendants-Intervenors.

United States Court of International Trade.

September 25, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hogan & Hartson, William A. Bradford, Jr., Lewis E. Leibowitz, Steven J. Routh and T. Clark Weymouth, Frank J. Fahrenkopf, Jr., of counsel, for plaintiffs Techsnabexport, Ltd., NUEXCO Trading Corp. and Globe Nuclear Services and Supply GNSS.

Powell, Goldstein, Frazer & Murphy, Peter O. Suchman, Neil R. Ellis, Susan M. Matthews and Elizabeth Hafner for plaintiffs Ukraine, Republic of Kyrgyzstan, and Republic of Tajikistan.

Coudert Brothers, Mark D. Herlach, Matthew P. Jaffe, and Nathan V. Holt for plaintiffs Russian Federation.

Stuart M. Gerson, Asst. Atty. Gen., David M. Cohen, Director, Commercial Litigation Branch, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Civil Div., Marc E. Montalbine, David W. Richardson, Attorney-Advisor, Office of the Chief Counsel for Import Admin., U.S. Dept. of Commerce, of counsel, for defendants.

Akin, Gump, Hauer & Feld, Valerie A. Slater, Nicholas D. Giordano and Anne L. Doherty, for defendants-intervenors.

OPINION

RESTANI, Judge:

This action challenges the determination of the United States Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration to continue an antidumping duty investigation of uranium products from the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics following dissolution of that political entity. The determination is challenged by four of the six republics whose uranium exports likely will be the subject of any resulting antidumping duties. They are...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases