1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 842 P.2d
  5. 842 P.2d 428 (1992)
 

KRIEGER v. FUTURE LOGGING

WCB 89-03927; CA A71330.

842 P.2d 428 (1992)

116 Or. App. 537

In the Matter of the Compensation of Randolph A. Krieger, Claimant. Randolph A. KRIEGER, Petitioner, v. FUTURE LOGGING and SAIF Corporation, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided November 25, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David C. Force, Salem, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Vick & Gutzler, Salem.

Steven Cotton, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Charles S. Crookham, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before BUTTLER, P.J., and ROSSMAN and DE MUNIZ, JJ.

ROSSMAN, Judge.

Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers' Compensation Board holding that, by entering into a disputed claim settlement (DCS) pursuant to ORS 656.289(4),1 claimant settled his claim for neck surgery and that, by entering into a claim disposition agreement (CDA) pursuant to ORS 656.236(1), he settled his aggravation claim. We affirm the Board and write only to discuss the scope of the DCS and whether recent statutory...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases