DECKER v. SAN ANTONIO FED. CREDIT UNION

No. 04-90-00719-CV.

827 S.W.2d 441 (1992)

Rogelio S. DECKER, Appellant, v. SAN ANTONIO FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Texas, San Antonio.

February 28, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Herman H. Segovia, Law Office of Herman H. Segovia, San Antonio, for appellant.

Kyle E. Neill, Archer, Standley & Neill, P.C., San Antonio, for appellee.

Before REEVES, C.J., and CHAPA and BIERY, JJ.


OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Appellant's brief has not been timely filed. Tex.R.App.P. 74(k). We ordered appellant to show cause why his appeal should not be dismissed for want of prosecution. Appellant has responded with a motion for extension of time in which to file his brief.

Appellant's motion is deficient in two respects. First, it fails to satisfy the requirement of our local rules that it be verified. Fourth Court of Appeals, Local Rule 3(A) &...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases