SOUNHEIN v. CITY OF SAN DIMAS

Docket No. B063720.

11 Cal.App.4th 1255 (1992)

14 Cal. Rptr.2d 656

EARL SOUNHEIN et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. CITY OF SAN DIMAS, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Five.

December 21, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Brown, Winfield & Canzoneri and Mark W. Steres for Defendant and Appellant.

Barbosa, Garcia & Barnes and Douglas D. Barnes for Plaintiffs and Respondents.


OPINION

BOREN, J.

The City of San Dimas (hereinafter, the city) appeals following a judgment granting a peremptory writ of mandate which ordered the city to set aside and vacate its Ordinance No. 941, which banned any second independent residential unit on any lot in the city,1 and to process the application by Earl and Alana Sounhein (hereinafter, the Sounheins) for a conditional use permit, and reasonable...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases