1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 417 S.E.2d
  5. 417 S.E.2d 848 (1992)
 

STEPP v. SUMMEY OUTDOOR ADVERTISING, INC.

No. 9129SC480.

417 S.E.2d 848 (1992)

Lawrence E. STEPP, Plaintiff, v. SUMMEY OUTDOOR ADVERTISING, INC., and Boyd L. Hyder, Defendant. SUMMEY OUTDOOR ADVERTISING, INC., Plaintiff, v. Boyd L. HYDER, Defendant.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

July 7, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Atkins & Craven by Lee Atkins and Susan S. Craven, Saluda, for plaintiff-appellee.

Van Winkle, Buck, Wall, Starnes and Davis, P.A. by Allan R. Tarleton, Asheville, for defendant-appellant Summey Outdoor Advertising, Inc.

JOHNSON, Judge.

The rules bearing on summary judgment have been stated too often to bear repeating. Suffice it to say that summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and either party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Kessing v. National Mortg. Corp., 278 N.C. 523, 180 S.E.2d 823 (1971); Raritan River Steel Co. v. Cherry, Bekaert & Holland, 101 N.C. App...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases