1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 6 Cal.App.4th
  5. 6 Cal.App.4th 1256 (1992)
 

NALIAN TRUCK LINES v. NAKANO WAREHOUSE & TRANSP.

Docket No. B061732.

6 Cal.App.4th 1256 (1992)

8 Cal. Rptr.2d 467

NALIAN TRUCK LINES, INC., Plaintiff and Respondent, v. NAKANO WAREHOUSE & TRANSPORTATION CORP., Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division One.

May 27, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Crosby, Heafey, Roach & May, Ezra Hendon, Michael J. Belcher, John L. Johnson III, Valarie Mark and James Martin for Defendant and Appellant.

Morris Shechter and Wanda Grasse for Plaintiff and Respondent.

OPINION

DEVICH, Acting P.J.

(1) (See fn. 1.) Is it proper for an attorney to communicate ex parte with a former member of a corporate adversary's "control group"?1 We conclude that rule 2-100 of the State Bar Rules of Professional Conduct2 permits such communications. Accordingly, we reverse the trial court's order...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases