1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 3 Cal.App.4th
  5. 3 Cal.App.4th 1257 (1992)
 

BRADBURY v. KAISER

Docket No. B056734.

3 Cal.App.4th 1257 (1992)

5 Cal. Rptr.2d 325

MICHAEL D. BRADBURY, as District Attorney, etc., Plaintiff, v. JACK D. KAISER et al., Defendants and Respondents; FRANCHISE TAX BOARD, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Six.

February 25, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General, Edmond B. Mamer and Marla K. Markman, Deputy Attorneys General, for Defendant and Appellant.

Peter J. Celeste for Defendants and Respondents.

OPINION

GILBERT, J.

We hold that a withholding order served pursuant to Revenue and Taxation Code1 section 18817 is not subject to Government Code section 7170, subdivision (c)(2) which establishes priorities between state tax liens and other perfected liens on personal property. We reverse.

FACTS

The subject matter of the dispute is a cashier's check in the amount of $15,000 made payable...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases