U.S. v. QUIGLEY

File No. 1:91:CR:146.

798 F.Supp. 451 (1992)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. David James QUIGLEY and Michael Kelly Holdridge, Defendants.

United States District Court, W.D. Michigan.

June 14, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Donald Daniels, Asst. U.S. Atty., and John A. Smietanka, U.S. Atty., Grand Rapids, Mich., for plaintiff.

Robert F. Mirque, Mirque, Seys & Zoet, Grand Rapids, Mich., for defendant Holdridge.

Timothy I. Miner, Grand Rapids, Mich., for defendant Quigley.


OPINION

ENSLEN, District Judge.

Defendants, David James Quigley and Michael Holdridge, have filed renewed motions for judgment of acquittal pursuant to Rule 29(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. Defendants seek the dismissal of their convictions on Count Five of the indictment (using and carrying a destructive device during and in relation to a crime of violence in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)) on the grounds that sentencing on Count...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases