GILL v. SAIF

CC 89C12469; CA A65889; SC S38998.

842 P.2d 402 (1992)

314 Or. 719

Charles B. GILL, Jr., and David A. Davidson, Petitioners on Review, v. STATE ACCIDENT INSURANCE FUND CORPORATION, Herbert Aschkenasy, Donald Cook, Harriet Sherburne, Thomas Spitzer and Daniel Williams, Respondents on Review.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

Decided December 4, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bruce A. Rubin, Portland, argued the cause for petitioners on review. With him on the petition were William B. Crow and Carolyn E. Wells, of Miller, Nash, Weiner, Hager & Carlsen, Portland.

William F. Gary, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Eugene, argued the cause for respondents on review. With him on the response were Sharon A. Rudnick, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., and Harrang, Long, Watkinson, Arnold & Laird, P.C., Eugene, and Charles S. Crookham, Atty. Gen., Jack L. Landau, Deputy Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.


VAN HOOMISSEN, Justice.

This is a claim for indemnity under ORS 30.285.1 Plaintiffs Gill and Davidson (plaintiffs) seek indemnity from defendants, the State Accident Insurance Fund Corporation (SAIF) and its current and former directors, for attorney fees and costs that plaintiffs incurred in defending themselves in the case of SAIF v. Montgomery, which was filed in Marion County Circuit...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases