1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 179 A.D.2d
  5. 179 A.D.2d 1065 (1992)
 

SITAREK v. SITAREK

179 A.D.2d 1065 (1992)

Dianne Sitarek, Respondent, v. David J. Sitarek, Appellant. (Appeal No. 2.)

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Fourth Department.

January 31, 1992

Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs, in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in directing that, pursuant to CPLR 5242, there should be a weekly deduction from defendant's wages to satisfy the court's previous order that defendant pay plaintiff's attorney's fee (see, Sitarek v Sitarek [appeal No. 1], 179 A.D.2d 1064 [decided herewith]). Notwithstanding language...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases