Judgment unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum:
On this appeal from a judgment convicting him of two counts of endangering the welfare of a child (Penal Law § 260.10 [1]), defendant contends that the jury verdicts are repugnant. That contention, however, has not been preserved because it was not raised prior to the discharge of the jury (see, People v Satloff,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.