Judgment unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum:
Defendant was convicted of rape and sodomy. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in prohibiting defense counsel from questioning the complainant about an alleged incident in which she engaged in oral sex with an unidentified third person while defendant was present but did not participate. That incident did not involve "the victim's prior sexual conduct with the accused" (CPL 60.42 [1]; see also,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
