Order unanimously affirmed without costs.
Memorandum:
Supreme Court properly directed plaintiff to respond to all questions he had previously refused to answer at the examination before trial. "`[U]nless a question is clearly violative of a witness'[s] constitutional rights, or of some privilege recognized in law, or is palpably irrelevant, questions [at an examination before trial] should be freely permitted and answered, since all objections other than those...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
