Judgment unanimously affirmed.
Defendant argues that his convictions under counts four, five and six of the indictment must be reversed because the jury heard testimony of two separate unindicted incidents conforming to those counts of the indictment. That argument, like all others raised on appeal and by defendant in his pro se brief, is without merit. The conduct of defendant and his accomplice...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
