KRUG v. KRUG


179 A.D.2d 1041 (1992)

Thomas E. Krug, Respondent, v. Janet M. Krug, Appellant. (Action No. 1.) Janet M. (Tina) Krug, Appellant, v. Thomas E. Krug, Respondent. (Action No. 2.) Janet M. Krug, Appellant, v. Thomas E. Krug, Respondent Ned A. Smith, Respondent, v. Janet M. Smith, Appellant John Simon, Respondent, v. Janet M. Krug, Appellant. (Action No. 3.)

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Fourth Department.

January 31, 1992


Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed with costs to Janet M. Krug, in accordance with the following Memorandum: Janet M. Krug appeals from an order which, inter alia, disqualified the law firm of Moriarty & Condon from representing her in a matrimonial action between her and Thomas E. Krug and in two separate custody proceedings between her and her former husbands, Ned A. Smith and John Simon. She contends that the case of Forbush v...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases