PRUDENTIAL PROP. & CAS. INS. CO. v. HAYGOOD

1910210, 1910211.

599 So.2d 618 (1992)

PRUDENTIAL PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY v. John Dow HAYGOOD and Dottie A. Haygood. John Dow HAYGOOD and Dottie A. Haygood v. PRUDENTIAL PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

May 29, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dennis Riley of Morring, Schrimsher & Riley, Huntsville, for appellant.

Henry H. Self, Jr. and J. Barry Mansell of Self & Self, Florence, for appellees.


MADDOX, Justice.

The issues in the defendant insurer's appeal are 1) whether the trial court erred in denying the defendant's motion for a new trial on the basis that the jury verdict was against the great weight of the evidence; and 2) whether the trial court erred by denying the defendant's motion challenging the verdict as excessive. The issue in the plaintiff's cross-appeal is whether the trial court erred by entering a summary judgment on behalf of the defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases