OPINION
GILBERTO HINOJOSA, Justice.
A jury found appellant guilty of murder and assessed his punishment at ninety-nine years in prison. Appellant's sole complaint is that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the conviction. We disagree and affirm.
In reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence, an appellate court views the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict to determine whether any rational trier of fact could have found the essential...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
