1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 799 F.Supp.
  5. 799 F.Supp. 410 (1992)
 

U.S. v. CANNISTRARO

Crim. A. No. 89-218.

799 F.Supp. 410 (1992)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Richard S. CANNISTRARO and Richard O. Bertoli, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. New Jersey.

February 11, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John M. Fietkiewicz and David M. Rosenfield, Asst. U.S. Attys., Newark, N.J., for U.S.

Richard O. Bertoli, pro se.

Franklin M. Sachs, Podvey, Sachs, Meanor, Catenacci, Hildner & Cocoziello, Newark, N.J., Stand-by counsel, for defendant Richard O. Bertoli.

Michael B. Pollack, New York City, for defendant Richard S. Cannistraro.

OPINION

LECHNER, District Judge.

This is a criminal action which originated on 16 June 1989 when an indictment (the "Indictment") was returned. Defendants Richard O. Bertoli ("Bertoli"), Leo M. Eisenberg ("Eisenberg") and Richard S. Cannistraro ("Cannistraro") (collectively the "Defendants") were named in the Indictment.1 On 29 September 1989 a six count superseding indictment (the "Superseding Indictment")2...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases