Judgment unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum:
Defendant contends that he was denied a fair trial by the presence of two deputies seated behind him in the courtroom during readback of testimony and portions of the trial court's charge to the jury. When courtroom security measures are challenged as inherently prejudicial, the question arises whether the security measures presented a risk that the jury's deliberations were infected. We find no such risk of infection...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
