Judgment unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum:
Defendant contends that his statement to the police admitting his involvement in the crimes was made upon a promise of immunity and therefore was involuntary and should have been suppressed. The only proof at the suppression hearing on that issue was Officer Penna's testimony that he told defendant, in response to defendant's request for immunity, that he did not have the power to grant it. Investigator Bolling, the...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
