1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 967 F.2d
  5. 967 F.2d 213 (1992)
 

EYERMAN v. MARY KAY COSMETICS, INC.

Nos. 91-3083, 91-3690.

967 F.2d 213 (1992)

Debi EYERMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MARY KAY COSMETICS, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided June 12, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John C. McDonald, Columbus, Ohio, Ann Lugbill, James B. Helmer, Jr. (argued and briefed), Lynn D. Pundzak, Helmer, Lugbill & Whitman, Cincinnati, Ohio, for plaintiff-appellant.

Mary Ellen Fairfield (argued and briefed), Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease, Columbus, Ohio, John F. McCarthy, Jr., Johnson, Bromberg & Leeds, Dallas, Tex., for defendant-appellee.

Before: GUY, BOGGS, and SILER, Circuit Judges.

RALPH B. GUY, Jr., Circuit Judge.

The plaintiff, a former high-ranking participant in the defendant's cosmetics marketing program, appeals from the district court's grant of summary judgment against her handicap discrimination and breach of contract claims. We affirm.

I.

The defendant, Mary Kay Cosmetics, Inc. (MKC), sells its products through a 170,000-strong force of salespersons organized into a pyramidal structure. The salespersons earn commissions...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases