1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 415 S.E.2d
  5. 415 S.E.2d 755 (1992)
 

PERKINS v. CCH COMPUTAX, INC.

No. 9110SC1257.

415 S.E.2d 755 (1992)

106 N.C. App. 210

Jack PERKINS, CPA, Appellee, v. CCH COMPUTAX, INC., Appellant.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

May 5, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Clifton, Singer & Russell by J. Kenneth Edwards, Raleigh, for plaintiff-appellee.

Patton, Boggs & Blow by Kenneth J. Gumbiner and Julie A. Davis, Greensboro, for defendant-appellant.

LEWIS, Judge.

The two pertinent clauses in the license agreement (contract) provide as follows: 29D. This Agreement shall be governed by and interpreted in accordance with the law of the State of California.

29E. This Agreement shall be treated as though it were executed in the County of Los Angeles, State of California, and were to have been performed in the County of Los Angeles, State of California. Any action relating to this Agreement shall only be...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases