Order unanimously affirmed without costs.
Memorandum:
The court properly denied plaintiffs' motion to reargue (which was deemed a motion to renew) because plaintiffs failed to offer a valid excuse for not submitting the additional facts with the original application (see, Foley v Roche,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.