1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 7 Cal.App.4th
  5. 7 Cal.App.4th 1162 (1992)
 

CANO v. STATE BD. OF CONTROL

Docket No. D014055.

7 Cal.App.4th 1162 (1992)

9 Cal. Rptr.2d 355

DAVID CANO, SR., et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. STATE BOARD OF CONTROL, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division One.

June 30, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Judith Rowland for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General, Henry G. Ullerich and Melvin R. Segal, Deputy Attorneys General, for Defendant and Respondent.

OPINION

NARES, J.

This case concerns the interpretation of Government Code section 13960. Appellants David Cano, Sr., Ariel Cano, and David Cano, Jr., (collectively, the Canos) first submitted a claim for indemnification from the crime victims' Restitution Fund established by Government Code section 13960 et seq.1 Relying on its interpretation of the statutes, the claim was thereafter denied by respondents...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases