1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 833 P.2d
  5. 833 P.2d 334 (1992)
 

ELECTRIC MUT. LIABILITY INS. v. AUTOMAX

WCB 90-00535; CA A69633.

833 P.2d 334 (1992)

113 Or. App. 531

In the Matter of the Compensation of Robert Hughes, Claimant. ELECTRIC MUTUAL LIABILITY INSURANCE CO., and Portland Auto Auction, Petitioners, v. AUTOMAX, SAIF Corporation and Robert Hughes, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided June 24, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bruce L. Byerly, Portland, argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief was Cooney, Moscato & Crew, Portland.

David L. Runner, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondents Automax and SAIF Corp. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Nelson R. Hall and Pozzi, Wilson, Atchison, O'Leary & Conboy, waived appearance for respondent Robert Hughes.

Before WARREN, P.J., and RIGGS and EDMONDS, JJ.

RIGGS, Judge.

Petitioners1 seek review of a Workers' Compensation Board (Board) order that assigned full responsibility for claimant's claim to them. We review for errors of law and substantial evidence, ORS 183.482(7), (8), and reverse and remand.

Claimant worked as an auto detailer for petitioner Portland Auto Auction (Portland) and respondent Automax from sometime in 1987 through June, 1989. On November 11 and 12, 1988, while...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases