1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 808 F.Supp.
  5. 808 F.Supp. 351 (1992)
 

MILOSLAVSKY v. AES ENGINEERING SOC., INC.

No. 91 Civ. 6042 (RWS).

808 F.Supp. 351 (1992)

Yury MILOSLAVSKY, Tatyana Miloslavsky, Plaintiffs, v. AES ENGINEERING SOCIETY, INC. and the City of New York, Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

December 10, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Yury Miloslavsky, Tatyana Miloslavsky, pro se.

O. Peter Sherwood, Corp. Counsel of the City of New York, for defendant The City of New York; Norma Kerlin, Asst. Corp. Counsel, of counsel.

OPINION

SWEET, District Judge.

Defendant, the City of New York ("The City") has moved under Rule 56, Fed.R.Civ. P., for summary judgment to dismiss the § 1983 complaint of plaintiffs Yury and Tatyana Miloslavsky (the "Miloslavskys"). Upon the facts and conclusions set forth below, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

Prior Proceedings

The complaint was filed September 9, 1991 by the Miloslavskys pro se<...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases