1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 617 A.2d
  5. 617 A.2d 540 (1992)
 

FORD NEW HOLLAND v. THOMPSON MACH.

617 A.2d 540 (1992)

FORD NEW HOLLAND, INC. v. THOMPSON MACHINE, INC., et al.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine.

Decided December 3, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Peter S. Plumb and Barbara Schneider (orally), Murray, Plumb & Murray, Portland, for plaintiff.

John S. Campbell (orally), Poulos, Campbell & Zendzian, Portland, for Thompson Mach.

David Hirshon, Thompson, McNaboe, Ashley & Bull, Portland, for Casco Northern.

Before WATHEN, C.J., and ROBERTS, GLASSMAN, CLIFFORD, COLLINS and RUDMAN, JJ.

ROBERTS, Justice.

Defendant Thompson Machine, Inc., appeals from an order of the Superior Court (Cumberland County, Lipez, J.) granting the motion of plaintiff Ford New Holland, Inc., for a writ of replevin and bond. Thompson Machine argues that the bond is insufficient because it is not a surety bond. Ford New Holland contends that Thompson Machine's appeal should be dismissed as an appeal from an interlocutory order. We agree that the bond is insufficient...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases