HADEN v. FRAZIER

No. 91-CV-525.

611 A.2d 546 (1992)

Mabel D. HADEN, Appellant, v. Sarah E. FRAZIER, Appellee.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Decided August 4, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mabel D. Haden, pro se.

Jeffrey W. Harab, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for appellee.

Before ROGERS, Chief Judge, and STEADMAN and KING, Associate Judges.


ROGERS, Chief Judge:

Appellant Mabel D. Haden, Esquire, appeals the order denying her motion to impose sanctions on appellee and appellee's counsel pursuant to Super.Ct.Civ.R. 11 (1991). She contends that the trial judge erred in ruling that the case was settled by the parties when appellant was not a party to the settlement and abused his discretion by not considering the appropriate factors in light of the record, which, she contends, indicates that appellee and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases