Defendant initially argues that the indictment should be dismissed because his wife was forced to testify against him before the Grand Jury and because she was going to be forced to testify against him at trial. Defendant, however, upon entering his plea of guilty, forfeited the right to appellate review of this argument insofar as it concerns a nonjurisdictional defect in the proceedings (see, People v Fernandez,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. BROCKENBERRY
184 A.D.2d 973 (1992)
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Frank E. Brockenberry, Appellant
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
June 25, 1992
June 25, 1992
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
