1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 187 A.D.2d
  5. 187 A.D.2d 965 (1992)
 

MATHEWS v. VISUAL THERMOFORMING

187 A.D.2d 965 (1992)

Eugene Mathews, Respondent, v. Visual Thermoforming, Respondent, and Prescotech a Company of Tennetics, Inc., Appellant. (Appeal No. 2.)

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Fourth Department.

November 18, 1992

Appeal unanimously dismissed without costs.

Memorandum:

The motion, denominated by defendant Prescotech A Company of Tennetics, Inc. and Supreme Court as one to "reargue and/or renew", was in fact a motion to reargue. No appeal lies from an order denying reargument (see, Matter of Hurley v Avon Cent. School Dist., 187 A.D.2d 982 [decided herewith]; Kirchoff v International Harvester Co.,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases