OPINION ON APPELLANT'S PTITIONS FOR DISCRETIOARY REVIEW
PER CURIAM.
Appellant was convicted by a jury of two counts of indecency with a child and sentenced to confinement for ten years on each count. On his original appeal he contended that the trial court erred in admitting extraneous offense testimony. We agreed and remanded the cause to the Court of Appeals for a harm analysis. Montgomery v. State,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.