PER CURIAM.
We reverse the defendant's conviction for possession of burglary tools because the evidence failed to establish any overt act necessary to prove the intent to commit a trespass or a burglary in employing the tools. Thomas v. State,
We affirm his conviction for attempted possession of an oral communication interception device, § 934.04, Fla. Stat. (1991). An expert testified...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.