SOLORZANO v. SUPERIOR COURT

Docket No. B067045.

10 Cal.App.4th 1135 (1992)

13 Cal. Rptr.2d 161

ADA SOLORZANO et al., Petitioners, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent; FAMILY HEALTH PLAN, INC., Real Party in Interest.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division One.

November 2, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Kurt Eggert, Morrison & Foerster, Joseph C. Markowitz, Tamara L. Joseph and Richard W. Grime for Petitioners.

Thomas S. Sayles, Alan S. Weinger, George A. Crawford and Nicholas Lanza as Amici Curiae on behalf of Petitioners.

No appearance for Respondent.

Rushfeldt, Shelley & Drake, Randall L. Shelley, Stacy Raphael, Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland and Timothy T. Coates for Real Party in Interest.


OPINION

VOGEL, J.

Ada Solorzano, America Rodriguez and Dolores Morales sued Family Health Plan, Inc. (FHP) for damages and injunctive relief, asserting violations of several California statutes arising from FHP's allegedly unfair and misleading advertising practices in soliciting subscribers for its "Senior Plan," a coordinated care plan designed for Medicare beneficiaries. The question before us is whether the federal statute regulating...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases