MILLER v. CITY OF DAYTON

LUBA 91-170; CA A73904.

833 P.2d 299 (1992)

113 Or. App. 300

Leslie MILLER, Petitioner, v. CITY OF DAYTON, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided June 3, 1992.

Reconsideration Denied August 27, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas G.P. Guilbert, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioner.

Melanie K. Hantze, Newberg, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Stan Bunn, James E. Green and Stan Bunn & Associates.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and DEITS and DURHAM, JJ.


RICHARDSON, Presiding Judge.

Petitioner seeks review of LUBA's dismissal of his appeal from the City of Dayton's decision to enlarge a basketball court in Courthouse Square Park. The park is listed on the National Register of Historic Places. However, the city has not designated or regulated it as a Goal 5 resource in its comprehensive plan and land use regulations as originally acknowledged or as revised for periodic compliance...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases