PER CURIAM.
We affirm the convictions and sentences of appellant for burglary of a conveyance, possession of burglary tools, and grand theft as we agree with the state that there was sufficient evidence consistent with appellant's guilt and inconsistent with appellant's hypothesis of innocence to warrant the denial of the motions for judgment of acquittal. State v. Law,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.