DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA v. CARR

No. 91-CV-36.

607 A.2d 513 (1992)

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al., Appellants, v. Oliver T. CARR, Jr., et al., Appellees.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Decided April 28, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lutz Alexander Prager, Asst. Deputy Corp. Counsel, with whom John Payton, Corp. Counsel, and, Charles L. Reischel, Deputy Corp. Counsel, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for appellants.

William J. Utermohlen, with whom Richard A. Green, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for appellees.

Before ROGERS, Chief Judge, and FERREN and WAGNER, Associate Judges.


FERREN, Associate Judge:

The District of Columbia appeals the trial court's judgment that the District violated the takings clause of the Fifth Amendment by using its distraint power in appellees' commercial building in a manner inconsistent with the lease agreement between appellees and the distrained tenant. Although concluding that the District acted within its statutory and constitutional authority under the government's taxing levy and distraint powers when it...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases