1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 10 Cal.App.4th
  5. 10 Cal.App.4th 1110 (1992)
 

RIVAS v. CITY OF KERMAN

Docket No. F015685.

10 Cal.App.4th 1110 (1992)

13 Cal. Rptr.2d 147

MARY RIVAS, as Special Administrator, etc., et al., Cross-complainants and Appellants, v. CITY OF KERMAN et al., Cross-defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Fifth District.

October 30, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Baker, Manock & Jensen, John H. Baker, James C. Schaeffer, Bertram T. Kaufmann and Raymond L. Carlson for Cross-complainants and Appellants.

Mayer & Reeves and Irving Berger for Cross-defendants and Respondents.

OPINION

BUCKLEY, J.

In this opinion, we hold that Government Code1 section 825 does not compel a public entity to pay a judgment entered against its employee unless the public entity provided the employee's defense. Section 825.2 ensures protection of public employees by providing for indemnity by public entities for employees' actions committed in the course and scope of employment.

THE CASE...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases