OPEU v. CORRECTIONS DEPT.

UP-91-90; CA A69836.

839 P.2d 276 (1992)

115 Or. App. 593

OREGON PUBLIC EMPLOYEES UNION, Petitioner, v. STATE of Oregon, CORRECTIONS DEPARTMENT and Executive Department, Respondents, and American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, Intervenor.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided October 21, 1992.

Reconsideration Denied December 9, 1992.

Review Allowed January 26, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James S. Coon, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Sherwood & Coon, P.C., Portland.

Jas. Adams, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Charles S. Crookham, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Monica Smith, Portland, argued the cause for intervenor. With her on the brief was Bennett & Durham, Portland.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., JOSEPH, C.J., and WARREN, J.


RICHARDSON, Presiding Judge.

Oregon Public Employees Union (OPEU) seeks judicial review of an Employment Relations Board order dismissing its unfair labor practice complaint against the State of Oregon Corrections Department (department). We affirm.

American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) represents employees at several correctional institutions operated by department. OPEU is the representative of the employees of at least one...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases