1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 839 P.2d
  5. 839 P.2d 271 (1992)
 

NELSON v. SPARC ENTERPRISES

90-04657; CA A70460.

839 P.2d 271 (1992)

115 Or. App. 568

In the Matter of the Compensation of William R. Nelson, Claimant. William R. NELSON, Petitioner, v. SPARC ENTERPRISES and SAIF Corporation, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided October 14, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert L. Ackerman, Springfield, argued the cause, for petitioner. With him on the brief was Ackerman, DeWenter & Huntsberger, P.C., Springfield.

Thomas E. Ewing, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause, for respondent.

With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and DEITS and DURHAM, JJ.

DURHAM, Judge.

Claimant seeks review of a Worker's Compensation Board order denying compensability of his claim. The issue is whether substantial evidence supports the Board's conclusion that claimant failed to prove that his hernia condition is causally related to his employment. We affirm.

Claimant worked as a lawn-maintenance supervisor. On October 19, 1989, he filed a worker's compensation claim for a shoulder injury that he had sustained that day. Four...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases