1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 807 F.Supp.
  5. 807 F.Supp. 300 (1992)
 

KING v. ALLIED VISION, LTD.

No. 92 Civ. 3852 (CBM).

807 F.Supp. 300 (1992)

Stephen KING, Plaintiff, v. ALLIED VISION, LTD., New Line Cinema Corporation and Innovative Books, a Division of the Innovative Corporation, Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

July 2, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Peter Herbert, Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman, P.C., New York City, for plaintiff.

Wesley G. Howell, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, New York City, for defendant Allied Vision, Ltd.

Joseph J. Santora, Santora & Allen, New York City, for defendant New Line Cinema Corp.

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

MOTLEY, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

In this application for a preliminary injunction, plaintiff seeks to enjoin defendants from using plaintiff's name in a possessory or "based upon" credit in connection with the movie "The Lawnmower Man". Plaintiff bases his claim for relief on the Lanham Act and similar claims under New York state law, and argues that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases