TEKTRONIX, INC. v. NAZARI

90-11477; CA A72401.

844 P.2d 258 (1992)

117 Or. App. 409

In the Matter of the Compensation of Bahman M. Nazari, Claimant. TEKTRONIX, INC., Petitioner, v. Bahman M. NAZARI, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided December 30, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Barbara A. Brainard, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner. With her on the brief was Stoel Rives Boley Jones & Grey, Portland.

Robert Wollheim, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Welch, Bruun & Green, Portland.

Before BUTTLER, P.J., and ROSSMAN and DE MUNIZ, JJ.


BUTTLER, Presiding Judge.

Employer seeks review of an order of the Workers' Compensation Board setting aside its denial of claimant's low back injury claim. Although we agree with the Board's determination that the claim is compensable, we do not agree with its analysis and write to explain our understanding of the relevant statute.

Claimant has been diagnosed as suffering from mild degenerative disc disease and backaches associated with lifting at work. On...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases